The Economist reports on Louisiana’s recent gubernatorial election and is, as ever, scrupulously fair:
Mr Jindal is something of a paradox. He is the first non-white governor since Reconstruction; he is a Rhodes scholar; he is the nation’s youngest governor. In other words, he’s a breath of fresh air, a sign of progress who promises to eradicate corruption in what many say is America’s worst-governed state. On the other hand, he is a religious conservative who was as reliable a rubber-stamp as George Bush had in Congress, refusing to make a fuss even when Republicans there were blaming New Orleans for Katrina. Not all of the air is fresh.
If Bobby Jindal delivers on his promises to reform government ethics in Louisiana I will be the first to congratulate him. It is sorely needed. Sadly, his record in Congress does not fill me with optimism.
More interestingly, The Economist notes that only 80,000 New Orleanians voted last Saturday. Why is that number significant? In 2002, Sen. Mary Landrieu’s (D) victory margin in New Orleans was 80,000. The total number of voters decreased 40%. It is safe to assume that the vast majority of that 40% were African-American, Democratic voters and likely supporters of Sen. Mary Landrieu.
Despite more than $3.4m cash on hand and no confirmed opponent, it is now clearer than ever that Sen. Mary Landrieu faces an uphill battle in her bid to be re-elected in 2008.




Current Conversations